Quote:
|
Originally Posted by heretiquely
a pro-singlish article. this must surely be a first for ST!
|
"pro-singlish"? not at all! this is a mere reporting of what we've known for ages. that this should even be a "first for ST" is extremely belated and highly embarrassing for many SG-based/related (socio)linguists!
honestly, ST's gross under-reporting on work done on singlish speaks of its unshakable position as a govt lackey in terms of sociolinguistic policies!
altho i read the ST nearly exclusively, i'm often at a loss for words when i interact with fellow linguists and am asked about the local sociolinguistic planning and policies.