November 23, 2009 Monday

ST Discussion Board Review Global financial crisis: 'Keep a significant portion of your portfolio in cash'
Page 1 of 4 123 > Last »
 
STTeam
Administrator
Global financial crisis: 'Keep a significant portion of your portfolio in cash'
September 20, 2008 Saturday, 07:52 AM

I AM A financial advisor and money manager, and many of my clients have asked me about the stability of banks in general and some of them have joked about keeping cold, hard cash under their beds.

Full Story
NELNELNEL
September 20, 2008 Saturday, 08:03 AM

If you have the money lah.

But how many RDians have more than $30000 in cash [net assets]?
unewolke
September 20, 2008 Saturday, 09:14 AM

hmmm...anything new?

yeah, look: "To sum it all up, keep a significant portion of your portfolio in cash just in case you need it in situations like these."

it doesn't take a rocket scientist either to know that such generic advice is best not dispensed, but if read, (to be) taken with a lot of salt. it's #1 mahoupao and #2 useless/inapplicable to those who either already keep a significant portion of their portfolios in cash, or have nearly lost even the shirt on their backs and therefore have hardly any cash to begin with.
SedonaLeLoi
September 20, 2008 Saturday, 09:17 AM

The Singapore government should seriously review SGX’s policies and also consider banning ‘Naked Short Selling’ immediately without any further delays.
adrianlin
September 20, 2008 Saturday, 09:22 AM

To me you dont seem to be a financial adviser or money manager. You seem to be a layman.If everybody keeps hard cash under the pillow, economies will stagnate. there will be no investment. It is amusing why you didnot pick on subprime system itself per se. Prime lending is when banks give loan to a person who earns decently and is capable of repaying the loan. If a guy earns low salary (say a factory workers) and he cannot afford to repay the loan, still the banks give him loan, but on condition that a higher interest will be charged. See the joke. If a person is financially not qualified for a particular amount of loan because he cannot repay it, how can you expect him to repay with higher interest? This is the stupidest thinking of the policy framers.
Boobsy.XiaoWei
September 20, 2008 Saturday, 09:31 AM

Besides gold,cash is the best.
code22xx
September 20, 2008 Saturday, 12:02 PM

adrianlin, seems u more clueless. The idea is to ensure that the borrower can pay interest is enough and cannot ever pay back the principle. If he defaults, then take his home. Win-Win situation. Issue when the asset depreciate, but the risk is compensated with high interest income...and fat bonuses, top hotels, private jets for bankers.

As policy makers close in, bankers are paid to find loopholes. Japan 80's bubble, Korea, Hong Kong, Thailand 90's Asian financial crisis are just some examples.
adrianlin
September 20, 2008 Saturday, 12:55 PM

Code22xx

Simple, then rent out the flat; dont sell. Just collect the rent and let them stay there.
sinkapolang
September 20, 2008 Saturday, 01:57 PM

Very simple. Just buy only what you can afford (meaning with CASH ONLY!)

However, cash loses its purchasing power. Thus, property seems to be the best hedge against inflation especially HDB flats with the government supports.
Misnomer
September 20, 2008 Saturday, 02:17 PM

Sound advice. I shall be waiting for the great property sale.
This thread is closed for comments. That's because threads are linked to stories which are available for 7 days on this website.

Warning: Any user who posts offensive or irrelevant comments will be banned from this Discussion Board.
Page 1 of 4 123 > Last »
Thread Tools



Forum Jump